I was today years old when I learned the non-reverse Firebird headstock was known as a "Platypus" headstock. I have to confess I haven't been around many non-reverse Firebirds, but I've never been introduced to that term in relation to a guitar.
In my inbox today (and Music Zoo had a bunch on Reverb in this morning's feed), the Firebird Platypus.
In short, it's a conventional reverse Firebird body with a non-reverse headstock.
This actually makes sense to me as the construction of the non-reverse headstock (single layer) might lead to a lighter headstock which might, in turn, result in at least *less* headstock dive.
But "Platypus?" There are some words that just don't feel good to say. "Lugubrious," "ointment," "Kardashian," are some examples, and on contemplation, I'm thinking maybe Platypus (with the exception of Perry, of course!) might fit in that group, especially in co-consideration with a guitar. Or maybe it's just me.
I'd have gone with the design being described as the Firebird's "beak."
Anyone else find this interesting? OTOH, for close to $2,500 one could pick up a gently used Kauer Banshee.
In my inbox today (and Music Zoo had a bunch on Reverb in this morning's feed), the Firebird Platypus.
In short, it's a conventional reverse Firebird body with a non-reverse headstock.
This actually makes sense to me as the construction of the non-reverse headstock (single layer) might lead to a lighter headstock which might, in turn, result in at least *less* headstock dive.
But "Platypus?" There are some words that just don't feel good to say. "Lugubrious," "ointment," "Kardashian," are some examples, and on contemplation, I'm thinking maybe Platypus (with the exception of Perry, of course!) might fit in that group, especially in co-consideration with a guitar. Or maybe it's just me.
I'd have gone with the design being described as the Firebird's "beak."
Anyone else find this interesting? OTOH, for close to $2,500 one could pick up a gently used Kauer Banshee.
